March 18, 2026
Bancrédito Holding is pursuing legal action to recover assets and establish accountability following the closure of the case against its founder, signaling a new phase for the institution.
Bancrédito Holding Corporation (BHC) has launched a series of legal actions aimed at recovering assets and establishing accountability following the closure of the case against its founder, Italo-Venezuelan banker Julio Herrera Velutini. The development marks a significant turning point for the financial institution as it seeks to address the aftermath of regulatory and legal proceedings tied to the liquidation of Bancrédito International Bank & Trust Corporation.
The move comes after the definitive closure of the case, which followed a full and unconditional presidential pardon granted by former U.S. President Donald J. Trump. The pardon effectively restored the legal standing of Herrera Velutini and nullified the remaining legal consequences associated with the case.
In a statement, Luis Zapata, Chief Executive Officer of BHC, expressed confidence in the judicial process and reaffirmed the company’s commitment to recovering its assets. He emphasized that the institution expects the courts to act rigorously in evaluating the circumstances surrounding the handling of the bank’s assets during the liquidation process. According to Zapata, the company believes that justice will ultimately prevail and that the assets will be returned to their rightful owners.
As part of its strategy, BHC has initiated judicial proceedings in both Puerto Rico and Florida. These legal efforts focus on reviewing asset management decisions and the legal counsel the institution received during negotiations with the U.S. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). The company contends that the advice it received contributed to actions that were unnecessary and detrimental to the bank’s operations and reputation.
The origins of the case date back to allegations of public corruption, which were later reduced to a minor campaign finance violation. In January, Federal Judge Silvia L. Carreño formally dismissed the case after co-defendants accepted the presidential pardon, rendering the matter legally resolved. Reports citing White House sources suggested that the case had elements of political motivation, further complicating its legal and public narrative.
In addition to addressing the broader legal context, BHC has filed malpractice lawsuits against several prominent law firms, including McConnell Valdés LLC, Holland & Knight LLP, and McDermott Will & Schulte LLP. The lawsuits allege negligence and professional misconduct during negotiations with FinCEN, particularly in relation to the acceptance of a Consent Order that imposed a substantial financial penalty on the bank.
According to the filings, the legal advisors failed to present key arguments that could have challenged the regulatory findings and instead recommended accepting conditions that the bank now claims were based on inaccurate or incomplete information. BHC argues that these decisions had a direct and negative impact on its regulatory standing and financial position.
“Our objective is to protect the assets and institutional legacy that were compromised during this process,” Zapata stated, highlighting the company’s determination to pursue all available legal remedies. The lawsuits aim to establish whether the actions taken during the negotiations and subsequent proceedings adhered to legal standards or whether they warrant judicial correction.
The company has also raised concerns regarding the liquidation process itself. In 2023, BHC filed a complaint against Driven Administrative Services, the trustee responsible for overseeing the liquidation in Puerto Rico. The complaint alleges that certain asset sales, including artwork valued at more than $22 million, were conducted without proper authorization and were unnecessary given the bank’s financial condition.
BHC maintains that the bank had repaid all depositors and was solvent at the time, which under the terms of the liquidation agreement should have resulted in the remaining assets being returned to shareholders. The company argues that deviations from this process require further legal scrutiny to ensure accountability and transparency.
Financial analysts note that the outcome of these legal proceedings could have broader implications for corporate governance and regulatory oversight within the banking sector. Cases involving asset recovery and alleged professional malpractice often set important precedents, particularly in complex cross-border financial environments.
For Bancrédito Holding, the current legal efforts represent more than a dispute over assets; they are part of a broader attempt to restore institutional credibility and reinforce its commitment to transparency and accountability. As the proceedings unfold, the company is positioning itself to rebuild trust among stakeholders while safeguarding its financial interests.
The coming months are expected to be critical as courts in multiple jurisdictions evaluate the claims and determine the next steps. For BHC, the resolution of these matters will play a key role in shaping its future direction and its ability to move forward after a period marked by legal and regulatory challenges.
